Hi Hytaler,
This one comes up constantly, so here's my honest take. There's no universal right answer — only the right answer for your situation. I run servers both ways, and the decision usually comes down to three things: your internet connection, how much you enjoy Linux, and whether the thing needs to be up while you're asleep.
You've got a spare box or a home server, a real public IP, and you don't mind a terminal. Hytale's requirements are modest — 4 GB and Java 25 to start — so an old desktop or a mini PC handles a small group fine.
What you get: full control, zero monthly cost, and you learn things that transfer everywhere. What you pay for it: your home IP is now public, your upload bandwidth is the ceiling, and when the power flickers at 3am the server's down until you're back.
The dealbreaker is usually the connection. If your ISP put you behind CGNAT — common on mobile and a lot of fibre — you can't accept inbound connections at all, and no port-forwarding fixes it. That alone pushes plenty of people to rent. (If you're not sure what CGNAT is doing to you, the can't-connect guide explains how to check.)
A rented box runs 24/7 on a real IP with bandwidth you don't share with your Netflix. You're paying someone to make uptime their problem. For a community that expects the server up around the clock, that's not laziness — that's the correct trade.
Two flavours worth separating:
I'm not going to push a specific provider — your region, budget, and how much hand-holding you want decide that, and prices move constantly.
Start self-hosted to learn how the thing actually works — build it, break it, fix it. Then if it outgrows your connection or your sleep schedule, move it to a VPS. The setup is identical; you're just renting the hardware and the IP. Nothing you learn self-hosting is wasted when you make that jump, which is exactly why I tell people to start there.
Whichever way you go, lock it down before you hand out the address. A datacentre IP gets scanned just as fast as a home one.
This one comes up constantly, so here's my honest take. There's no universal right answer — only the right answer for your situation. I run servers both ways, and the decision usually comes down to three things: your internet connection, how much you enjoy Linux, and whether the thing needs to be up while you're asleep.
Table of Contents
- Self-hosting: when it's the move
- Renting: when it's worth the money
- A rough decision tree
- The honest middle ground
1. Self-hosting: when it's the move
You've got a spare box or a home server, a real public IP, and you don't mind a terminal. Hytale's requirements are modest — 4 GB and Java 25 to start — so an old desktop or a mini PC handles a small group fine.
What you get: full control, zero monthly cost, and you learn things that transfer everywhere. What you pay for it: your home IP is now public, your upload bandwidth is the ceiling, and when the power flickers at 3am the server's down until you're back.
The dealbreaker is usually the connection. If your ISP put you behind CGNAT — common on mobile and a lot of fibre — you can't accept inbound connections at all, and no port-forwarding fixes it. That alone pushes plenty of people to rent. (If you're not sure what CGNAT is doing to you, the can't-connect guide explains how to check.)
2. Renting: when it's worth the money
A rented box runs 24/7 on a real IP with bandwidth you don't share with your Netflix. You're paying someone to make uptime their problem. For a community that expects the server up around the clock, that's not laziness — that's the correct trade.
Two flavours worth separating:
- A plain VPS or dedicated box. You get root, you install everything yourself, exactly like self-hosting but in a datacentre. Best blend of control and uptime. If you can follow the setup guide, you can run a VPS.
- Managed game hosting. Someone hands you a panel, you click "start," you never touch a config file. Easiest possible path, least control, and you're at the mercy of whatever the panel exposes.
I'm not going to push a specific provider — your region, budget, and how much hand-holding you want decide that, and prices move constantly.
3. A rough decision tree
- Real public IP + decent upload + you like Linux → self-host, save the money.
- Behind CGNAT, or need 24/7 uptime → rent a VPS and run it yourself.
- Don't want to learn any of this → managed hosting, accept the limits.
4. The honest middle ground
Start self-hosted to learn how the thing actually works — build it, break it, fix it. Then if it outgrows your connection or your sleep schedule, move it to a VPS. The setup is identical; you're just renting the hardware and the IP. Nothing you learn self-hosting is wasted when you make that jump, which is exactly why I tell people to start there.
Whichever way you go, lock it down before you hand out the address. A datacentre IP gets scanned just as fast as a home one.
Last edited: